home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!caen!rphroy!cmsa.gmr.com!JHARTLEY
- From: JHARTLEY@cmsa.gmr.com
- Newsgroups: sci.skeptic
- Subject: Re: Homosexual Agenda (was: Fundamentalist nightmare)
- Message-ID: <168A3A4C6.JHARTLEY@cmsa.gmr.com>
- Date: 18 Nov 92 16:42:57 GMT
- References: <n0ea1t@ofa123.fidonet.org>
- Sender: news@rphroy.ph.gmr.com
- Organization: GM Research Labs
- Lines: 18
- Nntp-Posting-Host: cmsa.gmr.com
-
- David Rice writes:
- >millitary, and one who was against offically allowing homosexuals
- >in the millitary.
- >the millitary, in large numbers--- numbers equal to the ratio
- >protecting current and future millitary personale from losing
- >homosexuals into the millitary (as if they were not ALREADY THERE),
- >millitary, who were "a moral problem" in "Desert Storm," because
- >the current homosexuals in the millitary their right to be there,
- >is going to hurt the millitary? Has there been studies?
-
-
-
-
-
- Wow! I am surprised that someone who knows so much about
- the military cannot spell it correctly. A simple typo?
- Eight times in one page? Unbelievable. I guess expertise
- is inversely related to spelling acumen.
-