home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27 / NN_1992_27.iso / spool / sci / psycholo / 4455 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-11-19  |  1.1 KB  |  33 lines
  1. Newsgroups: sci.psychology
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!boulder!ucsu!spot.Colorado.EDU!dubin
  3. From: Mark W. Dubin
  4. Subject: Re: Physiology & Psychology (Q)
  5. Message-ID: <dubin.722200286@spot.Colorado.EDU>
  6. Originator: dubin@spot.Colorado.EDU
  7. Sender: news@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (USENET News System)
  8. Nntp-Posting-Host: spot.colorado.edu
  9. Reply-To: dubin@spot.colorado.edu
  10. Organization: Univ. of Colorado-Boulder
  11. References: <1992Nov19.152455.8486@news.weeg.uiowa.edu>
  12. Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 19:11:26 GMT
  13. Lines: 18
  14.  
  15. trocklin@news.weeg.uiowa.edu (Tom Rocklin) writes:
  16.  
  17. >There is an argument that says, roughly, that knowing the details of the
  18. >neurophysiology and neuroanatomy of an organism (I'm particularly interested
  19. >in humans) will still leave you ignorant  of important details
  20. >of the psychology of that organism.
  21.  
  22. >I'd be happy to hear comments on this argument (which I'm neither endorsing
  23. >nor rejecting), but more importantly, I'd appreciate pointers to published
  24. >versions of the argument (and related arguments).                ^^^^^^^^^
  25.  
  26.  
  27. For a slightly indirect approach to this try, available in paperback:
  28.  
  29. Minds, Brains and Science by John Searle.
  30.  
  31. --the ol' professor
  32.  
  33.