home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!linac!att!cbnewse!cbnewsd!att-out!pacbell.com!iggy.GW.Vitalink.COM!nocsun.NOC.Vitalink.COM!wsrcc!alison
- From: alison@wsrcc.com (Alison Chaiken)
- Subject: Re: Communicating Physics (was Re: Detecting crackpots - for laymen?)
- Message-ID: <Bxy8Bo.1HI@wsrcc.com>
- Organization: W S Rupprecht Computer Consulting, Fremont CA
- References: <1541700002@gn.apc.org> <1992Nov17.231944.13221@meteor.wisc.edu> <18NOV199210501176@csa1.lbl.gov>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 05:52:36 GMT
- Lines: 23
-
- sichase@csa1.lbl.gov (SCOTT I CHASE) writes:
- >Ask a random person on the street to tell you anything about modern
- >biology - something you couldn't find in a textbook written in 1950.
- >How about chemistry? I think you would find many more people who
- >could tell you lots of qualitative stuff about physics in the last 40
- >years . . . . The Big Bang and the CMBR, quarks, high Tc
- >superconductivity, supernova observations, chaos, etc.
-
- I agree that many educated people have heard of the topics you list,
- but I would be surprised if most of the same people haven't heard of
- plastics and catalytic converters (post-war chemistry), or cloning,
- gene-splicing and Jane Goodall (post-war biology). In fact, judging
- by the Science section of the local newspaper, I would guess that the
- average person is far more interested in large animal biology and
- human evolution than microscopic physics. This doesn't make me want
- to quit physics, but it does make me wonder why the taxpayer would
- want to fund certain large physics projects (whose names I can't
- mention without starting a regrettable flamewar again).
- --
- Alison Chaiken alison@wsrcc.com
- (510) 422-7129 [daytime] or chaiken@cmsgee.llnl.gov
- Look if you like, but you will have to leap.
-
-