home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!uvaarpa!murdoch!kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU!crb7q
- From: crb7q@kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU (Cameron Randale Bass)
- Subject: Re: Continuos vs. discrete models Was: The size of electrons, ...
- Message-ID: <1992Nov16.065208.28725@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
- Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU
- Organization: University of Virginia
- References: <1992Nov7.214329.24552@galois.mit.edu> <1992Nov13.194334.20447@sun0.urz.uni-heidelberg.de> <350@mtnmath.UUCP>
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 06:52:08 GMT
- Lines: 25
-
- In article <350@mtnmath.UUCP> paul@mtnmath.UUCP (Paul Budnik) writes:
- >In article <1992Nov13.194334.20447@sun0.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>, gsmith@kalliope.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de (Gene W. Smith) writes:
- >> In article <344@mtnmath.UUCP> paul@mtnmath.UUCP (Paul Budnik) writes:
- >> >This is the question. Continuous models are the simplest to work with
- >> >mathematically, but are the simplest possibility as models of physical
- >> >reality? I do not think so.
- >>
- >> It isn't clear to me that any such distinction can be made.
- >
- >As one simple example consider the difference between a model based on
- >finite difference equations and one based on partial differential
- >equations.
-
- Name a physical system in which the FDE is considered more fundamental
- than the PDE? For most of us, we take the 'true' PDE and muck it
- up, introducing loads of spurious conservation laws and higher
- order terms, by deriving a finite difference formulation of it.
- I'd be interested in a system in which we did the reverse.
-
- dale bass
- --
- C. R. Bass crb7q@virginia.edu
- Department of Mechanical,
- Aerospace and Nuclear Engineering
- University of Virginia (804) 924-7926
-