home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!spool.mu.edu!news.cs.indiana.edu!noose.ecn.purdue.edu!thistle.ecn.purdue.edu!muttiah
- From: muttiah@thistle.ecn.purdue.edu (Ranjan S Muttiah)
- Subject: Re: TIME HAS INERTIA - THE ENVIOUS REACTION OF TALBOT
- Message-ID: <1992Nov15.221706.28787@noose.ecn.purdue.edu>
- Keywords: TIME HAS INERTIA, i.e., TIME IS MATTER
- Sender: news@noose.ecn.purdue.edu (USENET news)
- Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
- References: <abian.721860217@pv343f.vincent.iastate.edu>
- Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1992 22:17:06 GMT
- Lines: 16
-
- In article <abian.721860217@pv343f.vincent.iastate.edu> abian@iastate.edu (Alexander Abian) writes:
- >(A2) TIME HAS INERTIA, i.e., TIME IS MATTER and that some energy
- ^^^^
- How much ? Some is a little bit vague.
-
- > is irretrievably spent by Cosmos to move TIME forward. Thus,
- > in particular, the Principle of Conservation of Energy must be
- > rejected.
-
- For small scales (in laboratories) CoE seems to be doing fine. For the
- whole cosmos, your guess is as good as anyone's; there's plenty of debate
- about whether the universe is closed or open. About, TIME. If there
- were no observers, who is to measure it ? It is pretty much a bookeeping
- device invented by humans. What type of TIME did you have in mind ?
- Anyway, according to the Hubble law space (and time ?) is expanding ...
- moving forward if you will.
-