home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.optics
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!EE.Stanford.EDU!siegman
- From: siegman@EE.Stanford.EDU (Anthony E. Siegman)
- Subject: Re: Laser Quotation
- Message-ID: <1992Nov23.181928.2272@EE.Stanford.EDU>
- Keywords: Solution wthout a problem...
- Organization: Stanford University
- References: <13539@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <By3D6n.K0I@world.std.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 92 18:19:28 GMT
- Lines: 24
-
- >I may be getting this mixed up, but it seems to me that he almost made
- >a point of not using the word "laser." Seems to me he called it an
- >"optical MASER" (please don't ask me what an optical microwave was).
-
- Many of the publications from Townes and from Bell Labs in that era
- used the phrase "optical maser", while others mostly used "laser". It
- was said -- I do _not_ know if this is true or not -- that this was
- mandated by the Bell Labs management on patent grounds: Townes, in
- conjunction with Bell Labs, held various earlier patents on masers,
- and therefore wished to make the laser appear as an "optical maser" to
- strengthen their patent claims with respect to the laser as well.
-
- >The other thing that comes to mind, and unfortunately I don't have an
- >exact quote or reference, is a story by Jack Finney. The story's been
-
- You might also note the passage from "War of the Worlds" by H. G.
- Wells published in 1897 which begins "In some way they (the Martians)
- are able to generate an intense (beam of) heat (from) a chamber of
- practically absolute nonconductivity..."; this passage goes on to
- describe something that sounds almost exactly like a modern CO2 laser.
- I quote this in Sect. 1.1 of my LASERS book; but I stole it from some
- earlier source, I've frankly forgetten just where.
-
- --AES
-