home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.med:21152 sci.med.nutrition:1344
- Newsgroups: sci.med,sci.med.nutrition
- Path: sparky!uunet!utcsri!skule.ecf!torn!newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!nexus.yorku.ca!tony
- From: tony@nexus.yorku.ca (Anthony Wallis)
- Subject: Re: Royal Jelly
- Message-ID: <1992Nov17.215956.18502@newshub.ccs.yorku.ca>
- Sender: news@newshub.ccs.yorku.ca (USENET News System)
- Organization: York University
- References: <davidmh-161192121442@jenni.ucc.su.oz.au>
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 21:59:56 GMT
- Lines: 27
-
- David M. Hill :
- > .. I have read a great deal about how wonderful Royal Jelly is, and how
- > it contains almost every amino acid known to man and needed by man to
- > do all the wonderful things fit healthy and active people need to do...
- > Is this all just marketing hype to make us buy an expensive supplement
- > which someone has taken the quantum leap of
- > "works on bees - must work on humans"
- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-
- Attributing benefits to human consumption of royal jelly is possibly
- a classic example of literalisation of a metaphor. The metaphor
- being hidden in the adjective "royal".
-
- The only established use of the proteinaceous goo is converting diploid
- (female) bee larvae into reproductive adults ("queens") rather than
- sterile workers. The word "queen" is metaphorical, and possibly a
- misnomer - she is just as much the "brood slave" of the worker caste as
- she is their "leader".
-
- Female reproductives have, of course, larger ovaries than their sterile
- sisters. They also have _smaller_ brains. This latter fact is not
- well-known outside hymenopteran research circles. It certainly is not
- going to be publicised by promoters of "royal" jelly.
-
- --
- tony@nexus.yorku.ca = Tony Wallis, York University, Toronto, Canada
-
-