home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.logic
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!aun.uninett.no!nuug!nntp.nta.no!hal.nta.no!klaus
- From: klaus.gaarder@nta.no (Klaus Gaarder TFI)
- Subject: Re: Why Logic?
- Message-ID: <1992Nov18.142434.24001@nntp.nta.no>
- Sender: klaus@hal.nta.no (Klaus Gaarder FNI)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: periferix.nta.no
- Organization: Norwegian Telecom Research
- References: <1992Nov16.091653.1@woods.ulowell.edu>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 92 14:24:34 GMT
- Lines: 17
-
- In article <1992Nov16.091653.1@woods.ulowell.edu>, cotera@woods.ulowell.edu writes:
- |> Can anyone explain why we use logic? Unfortunately, any logical arguments to
- |> support logic, are unfortunately, invalid.
- |> --Ray Cote
-
- Simple: to get from 'true' statements about some universe of discourse to other
- true statements of the same universe. Why this has turned out to be the preferred
- way of doing science should be obvious.
-
- Klaus
- --
- __o
- _`\<,_
- (*)/ (*) Claudio Caputti
- +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++^++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
- Free will - the result of chaotic amplification of quantum events in the brain.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-