home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!caen!sdd.hp.com!cs.utexas.edu!news
- From: turpin@cs.utexas.edu (Russell Turpin)
- Newsgroups: sci.logic
- Subject: Re: Why invalid? (was: Why logic?)
- Date: 16 Nov 1992 13:41:30 -0600
- Organization: CS Dept, University of Texas at Austin
- Lines: 11
- Message-ID: <lgfubaINN7v@peaches.cs.utexas.edu>
- References: <1992Nov16.091653.1@woods.ulowell.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: peaches.cs.utexas.edu
-
- -*----
- In article <1992Nov16.091653.1@woods.ulowell.edu> cotera@woods.ulowell.edu writes:
- > Can anyone explain why we use logic? Unfortunately, any logical
- > arguments to support logic, are unfortunately, invalid.
-
- Unfortunately, I have no notion of what Ray Cote means by
- "invalid." Perhaps he could explain this. (Those who notice
- that such explanation is meta-logical discussion get an A.)
-
- Russell
-
-