home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.logic:2050 sci.math:15007
- Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!hsdndev!husc-news.harvard.edu!husc10.harvard.edu!zeleny
- From: zeleny@husc10.harvard.edu (Michael Zeleny)
- Newsgroups: sci.logic,sci.math
- Subject: Re: Logic and Mathematicians
- Message-ID: <1992Nov15.191744.17481@husc3.harvard.edu>
- Date: 16 Nov 92 00:17:43 GMT
- References: <1992Nov12.204959.17389@husc3.harvard.edu> <1992Nov14.141234.26280@email.tuwien.ac.at> <1992Nov15.220359.21971@guinness.idbsu.edu>
- Organization: The Phallogocentric Cabal
- Lines: 39
- Nntp-Posting-Host: husc10.harvard.edu
-
- In article <1992Nov15.220359.21971@guinness.idbsu.edu>
- holmes@garnet.idbsu.edu (Randall Holmes) writes:
-
- >In article <1992Nov14.141234.26280@email.tuwien.ac.at>
- >zach@csdec1.tuwien.ac.at writes:
-
- >>In article <1992Nov12.204959.17389@husc3.harvard.edu>,
- >>zeleny@husc10.harvard.edu (Michael Zeleny) writes:
-
- MZ:
- >>>I offer Post's problem as a counterexample. Also, it doesn't seem
- >>>that there could be a solution for "P =? NP" that would render the
- >>>problem silly in retrospect.
-
- RZ:
- >>Oh yes: Prove P=NP is independent of ZFC. It actuall HAS
- >>been shown independent in some weak arithmetics.
-
- Funny, I would have thought independence to be indicative of
- foundational profundity, rather than triviality.
-
- >>--
- >>Richard Zach Technische Universitaet Wien
- >>[zach@csdec1.tuwien.ac.at] Abteilung fuer Formale Logik 185.2
-
- RH:
- >Wouldn't that actually answer the question?
-
- Only from the standpoint of a formalist.
-
- >--
- >The opinions expressed --Sincerely,
- >above are not the "official" M. Randall Holmes
- >opinions of any person Math. Dept., Boise State Univ.
- >or institution. holmes@opal.idbsu.edu
-
- cordially,
- mikhail zeleny@husc.harvard.edu
- " -- I shall speak bluntly, because life is short."
-