home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!nic.umass.edu!dime!chelm.cs.umass.edu!yodaiken
- From: yodaiken@chelm.cs.umass.edu (victor yodaiken)
- Newsgroups: sci.energy
- Subject: Re: Greenpeace: Anti-US feelings
- Message-ID: <56457@dime.cs.umass.edu>
- Date: 19 Nov 92 19:03:17 GMT
- References: <1992Nov17.161857.24416@gn.ecn.purdue.edu>
- Sender: news@dime.cs.umass.edu
- Organization: University of Massachusetts, Amherst
- Lines: 31
-
- In article <1992Nov17.161857.24416@gn.ecn.purdue.edu> dyrda@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (Richard Dyrda) writes:
- >
- > As with the current thread on Greenpeace's amnesia on Saddam's environmental
- >catastrophies, oh I forgot it was the US's fault because we were bombing
- >him at the time. I'd like to show some other environmental disasters that
- >Greenpeace seems to have forgotten.
- >
- > Yellow Rain usage in Afghanistan and SE Asia.
- > RNS SSN Mike sinking in the N. Atlantic due to reactor fire.
- > Eastern Europe, esp. Romania and Hungary and their garbage problems
- > Daniel Ortega using chemical agents on Sandinista farms and "suspected" farms.
-
- This is, of course, confused, innacurate, and absurd.
- I won't bother to refute this farrago of nonsense and misinformation line
- by line but I am mystified by Daniel Ortega's use of "chemical
- agents" on the "suspected" farms of his own party. What's a
- "'suspected' farm"? Why would Mr. Ortega use these "chemical agents" on
- them?
-
- > It seems that Greenpeace only cares about Capitalistic countries' eco-
- >faults. The US and the free world spend well over $1 trillion dollars
- >on ours and the world's so-called ecological time bombs. I don't see any
-
- Sounds alarming.
-
-
- --
-
-
- yodaiken@chelm.cs.umass.edu
-
-