home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!know!cass.ma02.bull.com!mips2!news.bbn.com!seismo!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!network.ucsd.edu!news!avalon.nwc.navy.mil!peewee!erik
- From: erik@peewee.nwc.navy.mil (Erik van Bronkhorst Code 3814 Phone 939-1421)
- Newsgroups: sci.electronics
- Subject: Re: police laser radar
- Message-ID: <Bxvo18.2zH@avalon.nwc.navy.mil>
- Date: 17 Nov 92 20:39:08 GMT
- References: <Nov16.225043.36767@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU> <1992Nov17.163243.15574@col.hp.com>
- Sender: usenet@avalon.nwc.navy.mil (NWC News Admin)
- Distribution: usa
- Organization: NAVAIRWARCENWPNDIV, China Lake
- Lines: 17
-
- In article <1992Nov17.163243.15574@col.hp.com> dag@col.hp.com (David Geiser) writes:
- >> If your source is brighter than the reflection of the officer's source.
- >>
- >> If they find the system on your car, say it is your garage door opener.
- >
- >It's not illegal to broadcast IR, yet.
-
- Unfortunately it *is* illegal to "interfere with the duty of..." :-(
- as well as probably a dozen other "catch-all" laws.
- The bottom line is, detection is already illegal in some places (for RF),
- jamming is definitely not going to fly anywhere -- *if* you get caught.
-
- IMO "stealth" measures are probably the best defense against IR speed
- measurement.
- --
- Erik van Bronkhorst KC6UUT DoD#4342585443 AMA#[classified]
- "Truth is false and logic lost, now the fourth dimension is crossed..."
-