home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.econ
- Path: sparky!uunet!uchinews!ellis!thf2
- From: thf2@ellis.uchicago.edu (Ted Frank)
- Subject: Re: A Supply Side Call to Arms
- Message-ID: <1992Nov22.054743.7324@midway.uchicago.edu>
- Sender: news@uchinews.uchicago.edu (News System)
- Reply-To: thf2@midway.uchicago.edu
- Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
- References: <0#F=S+-@engin.umich.edu> <56352@dime.cs.umass.edu> <m2F=Rj+@engin.umich.edu>
- Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 05:47:43 GMT
- Lines: 24
-
- In article <m2F=Rj+@engin.umich.edu> jwh@citi.umich.edu writes:
- >In article <56352@dime.cs.umass.edu>, yodaiken@chelm.cs.umass.edu (victor yodaiken) writes:
- >|> What form of Keynsianism suggests that all government spending is
- >|> equivalent?
- >
- >Perhaps the form originally espoused by Keynes himself? I believe
- >that Keynes claimed that *any* spending by government would be
- >beneficial.
-
- Every Keynesian model I've seen distinguishes between government
- investment and transfer payments. This may not have been Keynes who
- did this, but Keynesian economists certainly do.
-
- >I think the example he gave concerned hiring workers
- >to dig a hole to bury gold and then hiring people to dig it back
- >up again.
-
- I have yet to see evidence that Keynes proposed this seriously.
- The excerpt Bret posted looked very much tongue-in-cheek, and I'd
- love to see the three pages before and after that example.
- --
- ted frank | thf2@ellis.uchicago.edu
- standard disclaimers | void where prohibited
- the university of chicago law school, chicago, illinois 60637
-