home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!rock!concert!duke!srt
- From: srt@duke.cs.duke.edu (Stephen R. Tate)
- Newsgroups: sci.crypt
- Subject: Re: Cryptography and P=NP
- Message-ID: <722537013@pike.cs.duke.edu>
- Date: 23 Nov 92 16:43:34 GMT
- References: <BxzD1t.3xA.2@cs.cmu.edu> <722273103@pike.cs.duke.edu> <By2v5F.DCM.2@cs.cmu.edu>
- Distribution: inet
- Organization: Duke University Computer Science Dept.; Durham, N.C.
- Lines: 24
-
- In article <By2v5F.DCM.2@cs.cmu.edu> jmount+@CS.CMU.EDU (John Mount) writes:
- >Assume an enumeration of all Turing machines. Suppose we want to
- >solve SAT. Let ALG be the Turing machine that simulates one step of
- >machine i every 2^i steps (so it runs machine 1 every other step, 2
- >every 4th , 4 every 8th).
-
- Ah... very cute. I'm not sure why I hadn't seen or didn't remember
- that construction. Anyway, I hereby publically chastise myself for
- not seeing this.
-
- Now a question: decision problems in NP are shown to be NP-complete
- by many-to-one reductions, so the decision problems would all be
- solvable by this technique. However, some optimization problems use
- Turing reductions, so you have to have an algorithm that always halts,
- even for negative instances (this construction does not halt in these
- cases). Are there ways around this? It seems that since verifying
- prime factors is in both NP and co-NP, that's the saving grace for
- factoring. What about other problems?
-
- --
- Steve Tate srt@cs.duke.edu | The reason why mathematics enjoys special esteem,
- Dept. of Computer Science | above all other sciences, is that its laws are
- Duke University | absolutely certain and indisputable, while those of all
- Durham, NC 27706 | other sciences are to some extent debatable. (Einstein)
-