home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.crypt:5079 sci.math:15301 comp.theory:2486
- Newsgroups: sci.crypt,sci.math,comp.theory
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!fornax!jamie
- From: jamie@cs.sfu.ca (Jamie Andrews)
- Subject: Re: Cryptography and P=NP
- Message-ID: <1992Nov20.174549.25343@cs.sfu.ca>
- Organization: CSS, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
- References: <1992Nov19.172719.1540@fid.morgan.com> <1992Nov19.193036.26711@rchland.ibm.com> <722206613@pike.cs.duke.edu>
- Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 17:45:49 GMT
- Lines: 20
-
- In article <722206613@pike.cs.duke.edu> srt@duke.cs.duke.edu (Stephen R. Tate) writes:
- >Huh? I can think of very, very few algorithms (programs) that can not
- >be counted on to halt. The only simply stated one has the halting problem:
- >given a program, decide whether or not it will ever halt.
-
- What about: any interpreter for a non-trivial programming
- language? This includes "sh", "csh", "perl", Emacs, and any
- Lisp, Prolog, Smalltalk, or Basic interpreter...
-
- > To re-iterate: programs that cannot
- >be counted on to halt are very, very, very rare. Most people will never
- >see one.
-
- Well, I work with them every day, and I would bet that you
- do too. I even write such programs sometimes, which is more
- rare but certainly not uncommon.
-
- --Jamie.
- jamie@cs.sfu.ca
- "The Tao's net encompasses the whole universe." - tao te ching
-