home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!morrow.stanford.edu!drizzle.Stanford.EDU!castor
- From: castor@drizzle.Stanford.EDU (Castor Fu)
- Newsgroups: sci.crypt
- Subject: Re: PGP and real criminals
- Date: 20 Nov 1992 15:50:20 GMT
- Organization: Stanford University
- Lines: 15
- Message-ID: <1ej1fsINN5ad@morrow.stanford.edu>
- References: <1992Nov20.092807.13613@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: drizzle.stanford.edu
- X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
-
- With all the talk about "suspected" child molesters, etc. I thought I
- would bring up one point. How do people feel about restricting cryptographic
- privileges of people once they have been convicted of a particular
- set of crimes?
-
- It seems to me that once a person has violated certain rules, e.g.
- child molestation, insider trading, etc. one might restrict their
- access to tools which are particularly useful towards those ends,
- e.g. guns, crypto etc.
-
- After all, in the case which is being discussed, hadn't this person
- been previously convicted of child molesting?
-
- --
- Castor Fu, (foo@leland.stanford.edu)
-