home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!ibmpcug!mantis!mathew
- From: mathew <mathew@mantis.co.uk>
- Newsgroups: sci.crypt
- Subject: Re: PGP and real criminals
- Message-ID: <iyqHuB7w165w@mantis.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 92 14:47:53 GMT
- References: <1992Nov17.001101.21926@ncar.ucar.edu>
- Distribution: world
- Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK.
- Lines: 31
-
- prz@sage.cgd.ucar.edu (Philip Zimmermann) writes:
- [ Assorted examples of extremist viewpoints deleted ]
- > If we are to prevent the electorate from backing legislation that
- > will make cryptography a crime, we must have articulate agruments
- > that will reach normal people with normal values. Some of what I've
- > seen lately does not meet that requirement.
-
- Well, I tend to argue the case for legal cryptography by using two arguments
- which I think anyone can understand and sympathise with.
-
- The first is: Does the person arguing for a ban on cryptography trust the
- government completely? Is he happy to let the government eavesdrop on *his*
- communications whenever *they* (not the populace) decide there's a good
- reason?
-
- If the answer is "Yes, I trust the government", then I give up. You can't
- argue with positions like that.
-
- The second argument is: Does the person arguing for a ban on cryptography
- have any idea how this ban might be enforced? Given that it is possible to
- disguise encrypted data as plain text, how will the ban be enforced?
- House-to-house searches? Polygraph tests? Informants? House Cryptographic
- Activities hearings?
-
-
- mathew
- --
- "Even the most bizarre of the unions (probably that between a cat's gall
- stone and a single note 'G' from CNN's ident theme) managed to convey a
- sense of rampant impropriety." -- 'Fortran Five', Simon G. Lawrence Leonard
-
-