home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.crypt:4931 sci.math:15118 comp.theory:2449
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!darwin.sura.net!europa.asd.contel.com!emory!ogicse!das-news.harvard.edu!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!GS35.SP.CS.CMU.EDU!sgall
- From: sgall+@CS.CMU.EDU (Jiri Sgall)
- Newsgroups: sci.crypt,sci.math,comp.theory
- Subject: Re: Cryptography and P=NP
- Message-ID: <BxvEF3.Kqw.2@cs.cmu.edu>
- Date: 17 Nov 92 17:11:25 GMT
- Article-I.D.: cs.BxvEF3.Kqw.2
- References: <1992Nov15.110945.19939@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> <PHR.92Nov15203840@napa.telebit.com> <1e7fvdINN87s@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca> <1992Nov16.084503.10141@vax.oxford.ac.uk>
- Sender: news@cs.cmu.edu (Usenet News System)
- Distribution: inet
- Organization: Carnegie Mellon University
- Lines: 14
- Nntp-Posting-Host: gs35.sp.cs.cmu.edu
-
- |> And remember, proving P=NP doesn't necessarily mean finding such an algorithm,
- |> merely proving it exists.
- |>
-
- Once you have the proof, you can easily run a kind of universal algorithm,
- which will be guaranteed to be polynomial
-
- |> --
- |> James Annan.
- |> [--------------------------------------]
- |> [ "The only good Tory is a lavatory" ]
- |> [--------------------------------------]
-
- -- Jiri Sgall
-