home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!bu.edu!transfer.stratus.com!ellisun.sw.stratus.com!cme
- From: cme@ellisun.sw.stratus.com (Carl Ellison)
- Newsgroups: sci.crypt
- Subject: Another argument for keeping keys private
- Message-ID: <1e992tINNnfi@transfer.stratus.com>
- Date: 16 Nov 92 22:58:37 GMT
- References: <1992Nov13.193629.14615@watson.ibm.com> <1992Nov15.055114.12777@colnet.cmhnet.org> <Bxs7Gu.9xx@wimsey.bc.ca>
- Organization: Stratus Computer, Software Engineering
- Lines: 28
- NNTP-Posting-Host: ellisun.sw.stratus.com
-
- In article <Bxs7Gu.9xx@wimsey.bc.ca> sl@wimsey.bc.ca (Stuart Lynne) writes:
- >
- >On the other hand it seems that other elements of encryption might be of
- >interest to the same goverment agencies. Digital signatures are good
- >evidence of authorship. If they where required on all electronic
- >transactions it becomes easier for them to follow the audit trail. No
- >sense in claiming that a record didn't originate from you if it was signed
- >with your digital signature.
- >
- >Secure and protected communications can be a benefit to the government as well
- >as the rest of us.
-
-
-
- Exactly.
-
- Before anyone can claim that a digital signature is mine, they need to
- refute my potential claim that someone else had access to it.
-
- If they have forced me to register my private key in a registry someplace
- where some criminal might have broken in and stolen it, then they
- can not prove my authorship beyond a reasonable doubt.
-
- --
- -- <<Disclaimer: All opinions expressed are my own, of course.>>
- -- Carl Ellison cme@sw.stratus.com
- -- Stratus Computer Inc. M3-2-BKW TEL: (508)460-2783
- -- 55 Fairbanks Boulevard ; Marlborough MA 01752-1298 FAX: (508)624-7488
-