home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.cognitive
- Path: sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!inmet!inmet!dlb
- From: dlb@fanny.wash.inmet.com (David Barton)
- Subject: Re: Meaning (not Theory of)
- In-Reply-To: lad@ausom.oz.au's message of 18 Nov 92 20:07:17 GMT
- Message-ID: <DLB.92Nov19100229@fanny.wash.inmet.com>
- Sender: news@inmet.camb.inmet.com
- Nntp-Posting-Host: fanny.wash
- Organization: Intermetrics Inc., Washington Division, USA
- References: <1992Nov18.200717.11887@ausom.oz.au>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 15:02:29 GMT
- Lines: 25
-
- In article <1992Nov18.200717.11887@ausom.oz.au> lad@ausom.oz.au (Lyn
- Dawson) writes:
-
- Something I've just come across may be of interest, if not
- scientific:
-
- "The Map is Not the Territory"
-
- "The meaning of your communication is the response you get - if you
- don't like the response - vary your communication"
-
- Both assumptions of NLP (Neuro-Linguistic Programming --- NOT Natural
- Language Processing).
-
- If you want to start a discussion about this field, I humbly suggest
- that sci.psychology is a better place to try. They have a regularly
- erupting flame war on NLP there.
-
- Some of the material in "The Structure of Magic" by Bandler and
- Grinder might be grist for the mill of sci.cognitive; however, it is
- at a "lay public" kind of level. Some of Dr. Grinder's publications
- might be better.
-
- Dave Barton
- dlb@hudson.wash.inmet.com
-