home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!yale!gumby!destroyer!ncar!noao!amethyst!organpipe.uug.arizona.edu!aquarius.as.arizona.edu!newberry
- From: newberry@aquarius.as.arizona.edu (Mike Newberry)
- Newsgroups: sci.astro
- Subject: Re: st6 images wanted
- Message-ID: <1992Nov23.215623.22368@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu>
- Date: 23 Nov 92 21:56:23 GMT
- References: <1992Nov19.214524.6479@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> <1992Nov19.225316.24612@nrao.edu>
- Sender: news@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu
- Organization: University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
- Lines: 11
-
- In article <1992Nov19.225316.24612@nrao.edu> cflatter@nrao.edu writes:
- >In article 6479@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu, newberry@kepler.as.arizona.edu (Mike Newberry) writes:
-
- I left out one sentence in my prior posting regarding the problem of
- widespread use of unsigned integers in otherwise standard FITS format
- images. Wht was supposed to go before the last sentence of the second
- paragraph was that we need a FITS standard keyword or a special BITPIX
- value of -16 to indicate unsigned pixel data. THAT's what I was mentioning
- should be discussed at the next FITS meeting.
-
- Mike Newberry
-