home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!chalmers.se!cs.chalmers.se!kehler
- From: kehler@cs.chalmers.se (Carsten Kehler Holst)
- Newsgroups: rec.scuba
- Subject: Re: Sawtooth Profiles - Why not ?
- Message-ID: <kehler.722566123@cs.chalmers.se>
- Date: 24 Nov 92 00:48:43 GMT
- References: <1992Nov23.124617.18245@csd.uwe.ac.uk>
- Sender: news@cs.chalmers.se (News administrator)
- Organization: Dept. of CS, Chalmers, Sweden
- Lines: 46
-
- In <1992Nov23.124617.18245@csd.uwe.ac.uk> rj_sande@kiwi.uwe.ac.uk (Rob Sanders) writes:
-
- >I am still a bit puzzled about the physiological reason against
- >sawtooth profiles. I know that they encourage bubble formation, but
- >could some enlightened person out there give a clear summary of how
- >this occurs.
-
- Enlightened (Ahrrm!). Well I've heard two explanations both of
- which I believe one of which I understand.
-
- 1) When ascending pressure decreases and bubbles form. [As far as I
- understand there is almost always some form of bubble formation.]
- Bubble formation in itself is not dangerous. Bends occur when
- bubbles are caught in the capillars of the body. The type of
- bends depend on where the bubbles are caught. Worst case is if
- the bubbles are caught in the brain or other parts of the nervous
- system. Normally the bubbles are created in the veins and from
- there brought back to the heart and into the lungs where they get
- caught and disolve harmlessly.
-
- One of the dangers of Sawtooth profiles comes from the risk that
- these bubbles gets compressed again and therefore can pass through
- the lungs and be carried by the blodstream out to potentially
- dangerous spots (like your brain).
-
- Another way bubbles can bypass the lungs is if you have some kind
- of heart condition that allows blod to pass between the left and the
- right side of your heart [the word most often mumbled here is Patent
- Foramen Ovale]
-
- 2) When bubbles have formed they grow! So by doing a Sawtooth profile
- you end up with bigger bubbles that of not.
-
- I don't know the precise relative merit of these two explanations, but
- both seems good enough to me.
-
- >Also, can somebody explain _why_ nitrogen becomes narcotic at depth ?
- >(I am not a biologist/chemist, but like to think I have reasonable
- >mental faculties !)
-
- I give up on that one :-)
-
- >Rob
- >rj_sande@csd.uwe.ac.uk
-
- Carsten Kehler Holst
-