home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!news.gtech.com!noc.near.net!inmet!bu.edu!transfer.stratus.com!gehenna.sw.stratus.com!gd
- From: gd@gehenna.sw.stratus.com (Greg Dawe)
- Newsgroups: rec.scuba
- Subject: Re: dangerous misconception (was Re: Human bodies explode...)
- Message-ID: <1egk8dINNo82@transfer.stratus.com>
- Date: 19 Nov 92 17:52:13 GMT
- References: <1992Nov16.145952.5495@mailer.cc.fsu.edu> <1992Nov17.131637.5461@cattnts.canada.ncr.com> <1992Nov19.145745.9605@mailer.cc.fsu.edu>
- Organization: Stratus Computer, Software Engineering
- Lines: 33
- NNTP-Posting-Host: gehenna.sw.stratus.com
-
- In article <1992Nov19.145745.9605@mailer.cc.fsu.edu> mayne@cs.fsu.edu writes:
- >One of my instructors told me that he got experienced O_2 toxicity
- >while decompressing on pure oxygen. He had enough warning to switch to
- >air and avoided problems.
-
- I recently experienced symptoms of an impending CNS OX/TOX hit while
- decompressing on a rich NITROX mixture (EAN50). I was at 49 FSW, well within
- the maximum operating depth (MOD) of the mix, when out of nowhere I felt
- nauseous and the beginnings of a headache. I checked my depth, just in case
- the ascent line I was on had shifted and dropped me deeper than I should have
- been, and switched to air. The symptoms went away in a few minutes.
-
- In retrospect, I had 2 predisposing factors: a fair exercise load, and a bit
- of anxiety - I was attempting to deal with a nearly out-of-air buddy and
- a charter boat which had pulled its anchor, leaving me to deploy my lift bag
- ascent line. While hanging on the line a lobster boat drove over the lift
- bag, but fortunately it didn't dump. Needless to say, I had a fair bit of
- physical and mental stress just prior to noticing the nausea.
-
- The IAND NITROX diver manual states that, "exercise greatly reduces a diver's
- tolerance to oxygen".
-
- I think this needs more emphasis. In my "neck of the woods" most of my
- friends switched from using pure O2 on the shallow stops, to using EAN50
- because it's generally perceived to be safer, and you can start breathing
- it sooner. This perception is probably faulty. Sure, PO2 and exposure time
- are important, but so is the workload. Speaking for myself I know how
- careful I am when decompressing on pure O2, but I must admit that I let my
- guard down a bit when I started using EAN50. Never again!
- --
- Greg Dawe | Disclaimer: I don't speak for my employer,
- Voice : (508)-490-6666 | nor they for me...
- e-mail: Greg_Dawe@vos.stratus.com|
-