home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!stanford.edu!rock!concert!rutgers!igor.rutgers.edu!remus.rutgers.edu!clong
- From: clong@remus.rutgers.edu (Chris Long)
- Newsgroups: rec.puzzles
- Subject: Re: Another sequence (SPOILER)
- Message-ID: <Nov.18.03.30.31.1992.18485@remus.rutgers.edu>
- Date: 18 Nov 92 08:30:32 GMT
- References: <1992Nov17.181310.17548@husc15.harvard.edu>
- Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
- Lines: 26
-
- In article <1992Nov17.181310.17548@husc15.harvard.edu>, Eric Blom writes:
-
- > 2
- > 11
- > 12
- > 122
- > 12211
- > 1221121
- > 1221121221
- > ...
- > (eventually) 1221121221221121122121...
-
- It looks like we have S_1=2, S_2=11, S_3=12, and S_n=S_{n-1}+R(S_{n-3}),
- where the "+" symbolizes string concatenation and R(S) is the reverse of
- the string S.
-
- > Prove that the infinite sequence never repeats.
-
- The density of 1's approaches an irrational number in the limit; if
- the sequence eventually repeated, the density would converge to a
- rational number. I'll post the details when I have more time, but
- the basic idea is that the number of 1's is characterizd by a third-
- order difference equation as is the total number of characters, so
- solve and take the ratio.
- --
- Chris Long, 265 Old York Rd., Bridgewater, NJ 08807-2618
-