home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.puzzles
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!cs.utexas.edu!torn!watserv2.uwaterloo.ca!watdragon.uwaterloo.ca!daisy.uwaterloo.ca!deghare
- From: deghare@daisy.uwaterloo.ca (Dave Hare)
- Subject: Re: Another plurals puzzle
- Message-ID: <Bxt6Hy.3A3@watdragon.uwaterloo.ca>
- Sender: news@watdragon.uwaterloo.ca (USENET News System)
- Organization: University of Waterloo
- References: <1992Nov12.213130.6852@thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu> <1992Nov14.044410.7840@cs.cornell.edu> <1992Nov15.020002.21566@questrel.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 12:25:09 GMT
- Lines: 23
-
- In article <1992Nov15.020002.21566@questrel.com> chris@questrel.com (Chris Cole) writes:
- >In article <1992Nov14.044410.7840@cs.cornell.edu> karr@cs.cornell.edu (David Karr) writes:
- >>>In article <1992Nov08.153848.24287@eng.umd.edu>, rabino@eng.umd.edu (Michael Rabinovitz) writes:
- >>>
- >>>> What words, other than necropolis, have their plurals formed by
- >>>> dropping the final letter?
- >>
- >>I can't imagine that "necropoli" is the plural of "necropolis."
- >>"Necropolises," perhaps, or "necropolites" if you want to pretend
- >>(poorly) to be an ancient Greek.
- >
- >Webster's Third has "necropoli" as one form of the plural of "necropolis."
- >Since I believe this is the only plural in English formed by dropping the
- >final "s," I decided to check with the editors to discover how good the
- >citations were for this usage. It turns out they are quite good indeed,
- >spanning several decades and all from authoritative sources. I can give
- >details if you're interested; just drop me a line.
-
- But there is an English noun which has the property that dropping the
- final "s" results in the plural of a (different) English noun. This is
- probably an FAQ.
-
- Dave Hare
-