home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!cogsci.Berkeley.EDU!robinson
- From: robinson@cogsci.Berkeley.EDU (Michael Robinson)
- Newsgroups: rec.martial-arts
- Subject: Re: Boxing vs Martian Arts
- Date: 23 Nov 1992 21:38:02 GMT
- Organization: Institute of Cognitive Studies, U.C. Berkeley
- Lines: 26
- Message-ID: <1erivqINN9j7@agate.berkeley.edu>
- References: <23NOV199210505001@zeus.tamu.edu> <v9H=yP#@engin.umich.edu> <26970@optima.cs.arizona.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: cogsci.berkeley.edu
-
- In article <26970@optima.cs.arizona.edu> hogue@cs.arizona.edu (Justin C. Hogue) writes:
- |>| I say the Martian wins every time. He just turns invisible and sneaks
- |>| behind the poor boxer.
- |>
- |>... not to mention the Space Modula-tor he usually keeps under his obi.
- |>Really, the boxer doesn't stand a chance.
-
- > I've been in MA for about 6 months now, and although MA is great, I
- >don't see how anybody can consider a boxer easy to defeat.
-
- [...pointless pro-boxing diatribe deleted...]
-
- >I've seen alot of mature stuff, with all options considered enter this
- >forum, but "the boxer doesn't stand a chance" is silly.
-
-
- Oh, hell. I just give up.
-
- Fish puns, anyone???
-
-
-
- --
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Michael Robinson UUCP: ucbvax!cogsci!robinson
- INTERNET: robinson@cogsci.berkeley.edu
-