home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!pmafire!mica.inel.gov!ux1!news.byu.edu!eff!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wupost!darwin.sura.net!dtix!mimsy!uunet.UU.NET!scylax!tiglath
- From: scylax!tiglath@uunet.UU.NET
- Newsgroups: rec.guns
- Subject: Re: Bad tactical position ( was Psychology in Defense)
- Message-ID: <Bxrvs1.3AH@scylax.uucp>
- Date: 16 Nov 92 01:09:57 GMT
- Sender: magnum@mimsy.umd.edu
- Organization: ScylaxCorp
- Lines: 67
- Approved: gun-control@cs.umd.edu
-
-
- apskato@vax1.mankato.msus.edu writes:
-
- ## OK, Someone tell me. I scream at the perp "ON THE FLOOR"
- ## He says "fxxx you" , I yell "DO IT NOW!" ......
- ## ... he doesn't obey. Stalemate. Do I shoot him or not?
-
- #No, you don't shoot him because failure to obey verbal commands is not
- #justification for use of deadly force.
-
- ## Lacking a better "technique", I say, if nobody is looking I waste
- ## him after the second try. No crippling shot, just my side of the
- ## story to tell. In a public place I am not sure what I would do.
- ##
- ## [MODERATOR: .........But could we appeal to the officers here
- ## on the net to comment? Surely training must address exactly
- ## this sort of scenario, where a bad guy is clearly covered but
- ## neither secured nor cooperative.]
-
- #I'm not an officer yet (looks like next year that will change) but I can tell
- #you want I have observed and have learned. If the suspect isn't following your
- #verbal commands, you just wait him out until you can get some help. Think
- #about it...what are your other options? Shoot him? He's not a immediate threat.
- #Are you going to try and wrestle him to the ground? Of course not. You've got
- #the gun, you are calling the shots and, generally, time will be on your side.
-
- #If help isn't on the way and you have no way of contacting help. Then you
- #should still wait him out. Essentially, "the ball is in his court". Keeping
- #trying the verbal commands.
-
-
- Waiting him out is not safe. He may be waiting for his mate or mates.
- Or you may crack up under continuous stress. And the longer the
- perp sees that you are not tough enough. The more he can think he
- can rush you, and succeed!. Why should I take a chance. If he is
- alone, ooops! I was wrong. If he isn't, ooops! I am dead. Can I be
- expecte to take additonal risk, imagined or not, for his sake. More
- scenarios...
-
- A. The perp has hurt someone in my family, I am holding him at gunpoint.
- again he doesn't obey but indicates he wants to go, call it quits,
- and gently, unmenacingly, he moves to leave. Do I let him go?
-
- B. Some one is picking the lock. I heard the noise and I see a black
- clad figure slowly entering the now open balcony door. I am behind the
- door armed, do I shoot first? The way I see, if he is a burglar
- and I make a noise 99% chance he'll flee, if he is a deranged sadist
- he has found his target, for which he might be well prepared.
- Am I expected to take this chance?
-
- C. The good guy is sick, old and weak. He holds the perp at
- gunpoint in his small bedroom, the perp has a knife in his waist. he is
- young, muscular, large and ferocious looking. He laughs at the
- commands, feeling his superiority in spite of the gun trained on him.
- The old guy is having a nightmare, shaking, his nerves frying. He
- knows that in spite of the gun in his hand, he is no expert and if
- he blinks or makes the slightest mistake he'll be history. He feels
- that if the tension continues he will not be able to control it and
- he may even faint. Does he shoot before his nerve runs out?
-
- I know many of you will say BLAM. BLAM BLAM!. That is what the instinct
- tells us. I personally feel that shooting is the safe way to go. But
- in all these cases there is not (yet) lethal force being offered, as
- the rule goes. Can these be exceptions to the rule? Is there
- a way not to shoot without takuing additional risk.
- I assume the good guy doesn't know how to control an unwilling body
- forcibly like police do. Experts speak.
-