home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27 / NN_1992_27.iso / spool / rec / gardens / 8159 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-11-20  |  1.1 KB
  1. Xref: sparky rec.gardens:8159 alt.bonsai:382
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!axion!gssec.bt.co.uk!dhamilto
  3. From: dhamilto@gssec.bt.co.uk (David Hamilton)
  4. Newsgroups: rec.gardens,alt.bonsai
  5. Subject: Re: Christmas tree alternative?
  6. Message-ID: <1992Nov20.155816.19161@gssec.bt.co.uk>
  7. Date: 20 Nov 92 15:58:16 GMT
  8. References: <1eb20eINN4oi@cat.cis.Brown.EDU> <1eb5k9INNe8r@transfer.stratus.com> <lgi9grINN85d@jethro.Corp.Sun.COM> <Bxx9tn.26x@watdragon.uwaterloo.ca> <1ee1srINNsps@cat.cis.Brown.EDU>
  9. Sender: usenet@gssec.bt.co.uk
  10. Organization: BT, Software Engineering Centre, Glasgow, UK
  11. Lines: 16
  12.  
  13. In article <1ee1srINNsps@cat.cis.Brown.EDU>, GE777009@brownvm.brown.edu (Jenna Cole-Steele) writes:
  14. |>
  15. |> I heard somewhere, (i don't know where) that many bonsai are
  16. |> poisonous. Anyone know the true knowledge?
  17. |> 
  18. |> Jennifer Cole-Steele
  19.  
  20. I don't where you heard that, bonsai are just dwarfed versions of
  21. normal forest trees.
  22.  
  23. Never heard of a poisonous oak or pine.
  24.  
  25. -- 
  26. David Hamilton                         Email:  dhamilton@gssec.bt.co.uk
  27. BT, Glasgow Engineering Centre,        Phone:  +44 41 553 2116
  28. 229 George Street, Glasgow, UK G1 1BZ
  29.