home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!decwrl!morrow.stanford.edu!ssrl01.slac.stanford.edu!winston
- From: winston@ssrl01.slac.stanford.edu
- Newsgroups: misc.writing
- Subject: Re: Run on sentences
- Followup-To: misc.writing
- Date: 23 Nov 92 18:03:11 -0800
- Organization: SSRL, Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lab
- Lines: 33
- Message-ID: <1992Nov23.180311.1@ssrl01.slac.stanford.edu>
- References: <380.2841.uupcb@synapse.org> <1992Nov23.181409.29089@srg.srg.af.mil>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: ssrl01.slac.stanford.edu
-
- In article <1992Nov23.181409.29089@srg.srg.af.mil>, dpipes@spica.srg (Dave Pipes x4552) writes:
- > Or what, really. This a pretty short sentence for Lovecraft. I recall one
- > that went on for more than one page (in a paperback). I think that it was
- > from "The Strange Case of" someone with an old New England name. Still, he
- > is a good writer...or is he?
- >
- > David Pipes
-
- "Charles Dexter Ward," if memory serves. (Obnoxiously enough, this was filmed
- with Vincent Price as, approximately, "Edgar Allan Poe's The Haunted Palace.")
-
- I've read a lot of Lovecraft. He often wrote in a fake-archaic way; he usually
- told, rather than showing (when he didn't claim it was too horrible even to
- tell); his short stories were often of the annoying kind that end with a
- sentence in italics, like "The face was the face of Minky the cat, but the
- whiskers were those of Colonel Claude Combpyne;"* his characterization was
- usually flat or nonexistent; and he used the word "non-Euclidean" without,
- perhaps, a very clear idea of what it meant. (Try drawing a picture of a
- castle in which two points don't define a line.)
-
- Nonetheless, he managed to write some pretty powerful stuff. "The Outsider,"
- "The Shadow Over Innsmouth," "The Call of Cthulhu," "Dagon" and "At the
- Mountains of Madness" are intriguing and compelling, and he had some original
- and bizarre ideas (not like Tim Powers, maybe, but pretty striking).
-
- I think Lovecraft has to be classed as a good writer who didn't write well.
- (This is different from, say, Stephen King, who is a compelling storyteller who
- writes with consistent competence, at least.)
-
- -- Alan
-
- * I don't know where I got this quote. It's clearly not from a real story
-
-