home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: misc.legal
- Path: sparky!uunet!well!moon!island!guido
- From: guido@island.COM (Guido Marx)
- Subject: Re: Radio station won't pay off my prize
- Message-ID: <1992Nov18.201437.6827@island.COM>
- Sender: usenet@island.COM (The Usenet mail target)
- Organization: Island Graphics Corp. San Rafael, Ca.
- References: <1992Nov16.170615.0312272@locus.com>
- Distribution: usa
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 20:14:37 GMT
- Lines: 35
-
- In article <1992Nov16.170615.0312272@locus.com> markd@locus.com (Mark Dubinsky) writes:
- >I won $1000 from a radio station in Los Angeles, but they're trying not
- >to pay it off. They say that I also won some amusement park tickets 19
- >days earlier (which I did), and they have a rule about winning only once
- >in 30 days. When I won, they didn't say anything about this and just
- >said to expect the check in 6-8 weeks. When I didn't hear anything I
- >called them and got this story. Are they breaking any laws by not paying?
- >Any relevant cases that I should know about? There was a case of a
- >California Lottery contestant who was declared a winner of some big prize,
- >and then the ball bounced into a smaller prize. He sued the Lottery
- >Commission and won, I think. Does anyone remember that case? I think it
- >may be relevant to my situation.
-
- Yes, I remember that case. The facts (from memory) were as follows:
- Woman gets on "The Big Spin", spins wheel, ball lands in "grand prize"
- slot, emmcee says "you just won 1 million dollars (or whatever it was)",
- family runs onto stage jumping around hugging each other (possibly
- jostling the wheel in the process), ball falls out of "grand prize" slot
- and pops into $10,000 (or some lesser ammount) slot. Emmcee says,
- "well, you didn't really win the grand prize". Woman sues.
-
- The lottery tried to argue that its rules clearly stated that the
- ball had to remain in the same slot for some period of time before that
- was considered to be the prize won. This was true, that was in their
- rules. However, the plaintiffs were able to show that the lottery
- routinely violated this rule (by examining video-tapes of other shows)
- and awarded prizes to other people before the ball had been in the slot
- for the specified period of time. The court ruled that they couldn't
- selectively enforce the rules. So, I would think that if you can find
- someone else who has won multiple prizes from the radio station within
- their 30-day limit, then you have got a good case. I don't know how you
- would go about getting such information however.
-
- Guido
-
-