home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: misc.kids
- Path: sparky!uunet!utcsri!torn!blaze.trentu.ca!trentu.ca!bwolfe
- From: bwolfe@trentu.ca (BEN WOLFE)
- Subject: Re: Diapers and the Environment
- Message-ID: <16NOV199222065490@trentu.ca>
- News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41
- Sender: news@trentu.ca (USENET News System)
- Organization: Trent University Computer Services Department
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 03:06:00 GMT
- Lines: 112
-
- allen@tessi.com (Allen Warren) writes:
-
- > Ben, in all honesty, it really is difficult to know what to believe,
- > given what you've stated above. Who are the "independent researchers
- > who take the time to read both and find the middle ground of truth"?
- > And if they're only reading biased data, how can they then extrapolate
- > what is right? Unless they do studies themselves, their extrapolation
- > must be questioned.
- >
- > I do understand that both the disposable diaper manufacturers and the
- > diaper service companies have biased data, but trying to discern what
- > is truth from two sources of bias is not believable.
- >
- > I understand what you're saying, but I'm still saying that unless there
- > really is an unbiased study, then we don't really know what all the
- > facts are.
-
- You're right; that wasn't very clear from my post.
-
- In general, the best efforts at balancing the claims have been made by
- independent, often quasi-governmental bodies that have no stake in one
- side or the other of the issue. Where I live, the Recycling Council of
- Ontario has made a careful review of the data and strongly favours
- cloth. We also have a national "Environmental Choice" program,
- sponsored by the federal Ministry of the Environment, through which
- products that benefit the environment can carry a restricted "EcoLogo."
- Diaper services and cloth diapers are included, and the standards,
- though they are a bit long, may help inform this discussion. Here's an
- excerpt:
-
- CLOTH DIAPERS
-
- Following are the factsheet and final guideline for Re-usable Cloth
- Diapers. The factsheet briefly reviews the research done on Re-usable
- Cloth Diapers by Environmental Choice.
-
- Re-usable Cloth Diapers
-
- Canadians throw out about 1.7 billion disposable diapers every year.
- The sheer volume of this waste places a significant burden on our
- landfill sites. As well, the consumption of resources for the
- production of diapers that are used once and then thrown away can be
- greatly reduced through the use of reusable cloth diapers. Design
- improvements have increased the convenience and effectiveness of cloth
- diapers and they are, in the long run, less expensive than disposables.
- ThatUs why weUre putting the EcoLogo on cloth diapers. TheyUre a good
- environmental choice.
-
- The Environmental Burden of Disposable Diapers
-
- Two-hundred and fifty thousand tonnes of disposable diapers and their
- contents go into our landfill sites each year. They are the third
- largest single item (after newspapers and beverage and food containers)
- in the municipal waste stream.
-
- Disposable diapers make up approximately 85% of the diaper market. In
- Canada, the manufacture of disposable diapers consumes approximately
- 65,500 tonnes of pulp, 8,800 tonnes of plastic and 9,800 tonnes of
- packing material a year.
-
- The Environmental Benefit of Cloth Diapers
-
- Reusable cloth diapers not only spare our dump sites, they take a
- fraction of the material resources to produce. Less than 10 kg of
- cotton is enough to supply all of the reusable cotton diapers required
- by a baby during the two and a half years it spends in diapers. It
- takes about 200 kg of fluff pulp and 130 kg of other materials (mostly
- plastic) to supply a baby with disposable diapers.
-
- If Canadian families switched to cloth diapers it would reduce the load
- on our landfill sites while decreasing the use of material resources
- such as pulp and plastics. Reducing the demand for pulp should also
- reduce any air or water pollution resulting from pulp production.
-
- Some concern has been raised that a shift towards the use of cloth
- diapers would increase the production of cotton and, therefore, the use
- of pesticides. However, even if all disposable diapers were replaced
- with 100% cotton diapers, the impact on the cotton industry would be
- minimal as the cotton required for the manufacture of cloth diapers
- would still represent but a small fraction of total cotton production.
-
- Diaper services certified by Environmental Choice use less energy,
- water and detergent than washing diapers at home. For more details,
- refer to the Environmental Choice factsheet entitled RDiaper ServicesS.
-
- For every consumer dollar spent on disposable diapers, there is an
- additional hidden cost for disposal.
-
- Based on a review of currently available product life cycle
- information, the product category requirements will produce a net
- environmental benefit by conserving resources and reducing the volume
- of waste in landfill sites.
-
- [End of quotation.]
-
-
- There's a similar but more strongly worded guideline and fact sheet for
- diaper services. The analysis behind this was done by the Canadian
- Standards Association (CSA) after a review of all available data.
-
- As for the difficulties of extrapolating from the biased studies
- produced by one side or another of the industry -- this is partly true,
- but one of the virtues of life cycle analysis is that all of a study's
- assumptions and calculations are supposed to be visible. This makes it
- possible to single out questionable (or, in the case of the worst
- studies, downright fraudulent) numbers, substitute better data, and
- recalculate the results.
-
- I hope this helps clarify the discussion. As far as the CSA is
- concerned the results are very clear cut in favour of cloth, and
- particularly in favour of diaper services.
-
-