home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27 / NN_1992_27.iso / spool / comp / unix / question / 13727 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-11-21  |  1.0 KB  |  25 lines
  1. Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!nic.umass.edu!news.amherst.edu!twpierce
  3. From: twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
  4. Subject: Re: IS UNIX DEAD?
  5. Message-ID: <By2Myx.89p@unix.amherst.edu>
  6. Organization: Elitist Usenet Administrators, Stuff & Nonsense Division
  7. References: <1992Nov12.005025.1251@global.hacktic.nl> <BxntrG.ECD@ccu.umanitoba.ca> <Bxw4JJ.HzC@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu>
  8. Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 14:59:20 GMT
  9. Lines: 14
  10.  
  11. In article <Bxw4JJ.HzC@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu> papresco@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu (Paul Prescod) writes:
  12.  
  13. >....OS/2, Windows, DOS etc. have PROVED that you don't
  14. >have to be a system administrator to install an OS.
  15.  
  16. That's not true.  They've proved that you don't have to be a system
  17. administrator to install OS/2, Windows, or DOS.  The fact that some
  18. operating systems install easily doesn't mean that they all can or
  19. should.
  20.  
  21. -- 
  22. ____ Tim Pierce                / 
  23. \  / twpierce@unix.amherst.edu /               Rocks say goodbye.
  24.  \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) / 
  25.