home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ub!dsinc!netnews.upenn.edu!pixmap.seas.upenn.edu!ioi
- From: ioi@pixmap.seas.upenn.edu (Ioi Kim Lam)
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
- Subject: WHAT IS UNIX? (was IS UNIX DEAD?)
- Summary: <looooooooong>
- Message-ID: <98284@netnews.upenn.edu>
- Date: 18 Nov 92 22:22:58 GMT
- References: <1992Nov18.001148.2448@global.hacktic.nl> <1992Nov18.133433.21809@ifi.unizh.ch> <BxxH6C.AGK@ccu.umanitoba.ca>
- Sender: news@netnews.upenn.edu
- Organization: University of Pennsylvania
- Lines: 64
- Nntp-Posting-Host: pixmap.seas.upenn.edu
-
-
- Lots of discussions have been going on about the topic whether Unix is
- dead. From my (biased) observation, many people have been missing the
- point. Before you posting more irrelevant materials, can you guys think
- twice - " What is Unix? What am I defending / attacking? ".
-
- I don't know what Unix is, but I can give a list what Unix is not.
-
-
- Unix is not VI, EMACS or C-SHELL
- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
- These stuffs are only the *applications* of Unix. They distinguish
- Unix (somewhat notoriously) from other OS's. Yet they were designed and
- implemented before my grandad was born. They do have their merits. I just
- don't think by arguing about their merits can help the future of Unix.
- What really makes Unix special is its capability in multi-tasking,
- security, portability, distributed processing .... and the list goes on
- and on. But please, exclude VI.
- (To please the VI fans - VI is something about personal taste, and
- I suppose all of you love French wine, too. Please post your support of VI
- to soc.culture.????. I would love to read them)
-
-
- Unix is not a toy for the computer scientists
- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
- The reason of the development of computing originated from
- outsides of the field. Now that we have such a splendid OS like Unix, why
- should we restricted its use to the universities and the computer
- literates? Why shouldn't a casual user be able to use it? In a few years
- everyone will be running a 1000 MIPS PC in their home. They need the power
- of Unix. And God (aka Computer Scientists), let these poor soles have it.
-
-
- Unix does not have to appear as a complicated system
- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
- Yes, Unix *is* a complicated system, but it doesn't have to appear
- so. Not every user has to handle this complexity. One system needs only
- ONE sysadmin. As long as I can get my Ferarri fixed by someone, I am
- absolutely eligible of owning and driving it.
-
-
- Unix is not a static object
- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
- Why can't Unix evolve? By stressing how wonderful Unix is now can
- only limit one's vision about the future of computing. OK, I repeat, Unix
- is wonderful, but it still has some problems. Find them out and fix them.
- Most of the supporters of the old features of Unix are, surprisingly, very
- young computer scientists. It is interesting to see many young men/women
- in a young industry talk like their grandparents. Where have they lost
- their vision and creativity?
-
-
- Unix is not immortal
- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
- Now there comes the tough part. Unix is not dead, I assure you,
- but it will be. Man is not immortal, nor is his creations. No matter how
- brilliantly designed and how adaptive Unix was, its foundations will
- become its limitations. In a rapidly changing world new products will come
- out and replace the existing ones. The replacement of Unix is a sign of
- progression. I love my old friend Unix but I would be very happy to see it
- die. They day that Unix finally steps down will be an milestone in the
- history of the computer, just as was the day when Unix was born.
-
- ioi the binary man
-