NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27/NN_1992_27.iso/spool/comp/unix/misc/4272

Text File | 1992-11-20 | 5.5 KB | 118 lines

Newsgroups: comp.unix.misc
Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!europa.asd.contel.com!darwin.sura.net!cs.ucf.edu!crigler
From: [e-mail] (James Crigler)
Subject: m4 - pseudo-survey summary
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Summary: Replies to my request
Keywords: m4,macro,preprocessor
Sender: [e-mail] (News system)
Organization: University of Central Florida
Distribution: comp.unix.misc
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 19:40:49 GMT
Lines: 104


Finally, I am posting a summary of replies to my inquiry about the
use of m4.  Many thanks for the replies.  And for the patience of
those who have waited with bated breath.  And bait breath.

My original question was this:

>Is m4 really used for anything,
>or is it just a curiosity?
------------------------------------------------------------
From the keyboard of David Barr <[e-mail]>:
I use it.  It's used as a preprocessor for tvtwm, a window manager for
X11R5.  I also use it as a preprocessor for my automount maps for NIS.
It's quite handy, actually.

------------------------------------------------------------
From the keyboard of Mike Oliver <[e-mail]>:
I use `m4' to preprocess 68K assembler files; this is in lieu of a
decent macro facility in this assembler.  The C preprocessor won't cut
it in this case because it doesn't preserve line breaks.

------------------------------------------------------------
From the keyboard of Peter J Dohm <[e-mail]>:
Yes, actually, tvtwm (Tom's Virtual Tab Window Manager) for X11 does
optionally use m4 for it's .twmrc parsing/macro expanding...  I find their
use of m4 to be basically pointless, but that's the way they chose to expand
any macros.  it's not really expanding macros, but just defining standard
things in the .twmrc with m4. seems like overkill, but it may have been easier
than writing the code to do this.  heck, i'm sure it had to have *some* merit
;)

------------------------------------------------------------
From the keyboard of Michael Haardt <[e-mail]>:
I use it to generate machine dependent makefiles from one general source
and as macroprocessor for my transputer assembler.  I love it since good
old Minix times, cpp is too poor in its capabilities and I am curious
about m5, which I ftp'ed today.

[Editor's note:  m5 is available on thor.ece.uc.edu in /pub/dain/m5 -- JBC]

------------------------------------------------------------
From the keyboard of Mischa Sandberg <[e-mail]>:
Yes, we use m4 as a precompiler for SQL (we use nawk as a report generator
and for more complicated symbolic manipulation of SQL). It's useful for
extending the standard set of in-line functions of Sybase transact/sql,
with equivalent but gross expressions; for example, to return a numeric
result MAX(COL1, COL2) --- the larger numeric value of two columns ---
can be done with the expression (abs(COL1-COL2)+COL1+COL2)/2); so we
define(`MAXOF', `...'). The only problem we've had so far has been working
around the reserved word "index", which is also an M4 intrinsic function.

------------------------------------------------------------
From the keyboard of Andrew D Hay <[e-mail]>:
i _did_, quite heavily.  m4 is/was the programming language of an
internal automated test tool called FAST (facility for automated
system test).  oddly, fast was pretty slow...

i think the at&t cpp is written in m4.

------------------------------------------------------------
From the keyboard of Kevin Walsh <[e-mail]>:
I was lurking about the news when I came across your message.  I don't
normally read this group as it is a long way down my active list.  That's
my excuse and I'm sticking to it :-)

In answer to your question, the m4 processor isn't widely used these days.
It used to be used as part of the assembler.  I beleive the cpp pre-processor
used to use it and it was probably used before cpp was around.  (but that
was before _I_ was around so I don't really know about that :-)

I can only find one actual current use for m4 and that is to process the
sendmail configuration files (like sendmail.m4 -> sendmail.cf).  Even that
has other utilities scrambling for a bit of the action (like the ease
language).

------------------------------------------------------------
From the keyboard of William Pietri <[e-mail]>:
I love m4; I've created a bunch of macro files for all my common
configuration files (like /etc/rc, /etc/ttys, and basically every file
in /etc that might get changed).  A couple of scripts will feed these
macro files to m4 with the the right things defined, and I will get the
proper rc.local (or whatever) for a given machine.

The win is that when I want to change some configuration detail for all
my workstations, I change one file and run one command (say, 'iinstall
/etc/inetd.conf ALL') instead of editing files on all the workstations.

------------------------------------------------------------
From the keyboard of Richard Brooksby <[e-mail]>:
I use m4 for two main purposes:

 1.  My .Xresources, .twmrc, and other X setup files are generated by
     m4 programs because they need to share information about which
     fonts, colours, and so forth to use.  The m4 programs also take
     care of different settings on different machines.  This allows me
     to maintain a central database.

 2.  I use m4 in our project for preprocessing assembly-language
     sources.

=========================================================================
Jim Crigler
[e-mail]
Guinan is Q's mother.