home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!yorkohm!rog
- From: rog@ohm.york.ac.uk (Roger Peppe)
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
- Subject: Re: BSDI/sparc (Rob's Talk) [Was: Any truth to BSDI doing a port to Sparc?]
- Keywords: bsd4.4
- Message-ID: <1992Nov16.183129.18304@ohm.york.ac.uk>
- Date: 16 Nov 92 18:31:29 GMT
- Sender: rog@ohm.york.ac.uk (Roger Peppe)
- Organization: Electronics Department, University of York, UK
- Lines: 47
-
- In article <1992Nov14.015225.13368@tgivan.wimsey.bc.ca> mak@tgivan.wimsey.bc.ca (Bob Makowski) writes:
- > In article <kzin.721536140@cc.gatech.edu> kzin@terminus.gatech.edu (John Rudd) writes:
- > >
- > >I was just curious if there was any truth to the claim that
- > >I've heard about BSDI doing a port of BSD to the Sparc line,
- > >so that BSD lovers can avoid Solaris 2? If so, when?
- > >
- >
- > I've watched the appropriate groups for a week. Noone's seemed to pick up
- > on Rob Kolstad's keynote at the SUG Conference. So I've excerpted last
- > week's post in postscript herein. Note, the tantilizing noun used was
- > "BSD" and not "BSDI". But hey, ... where else is BSD really alive anymore? ;-)
-
- I don't know whether this is old news (as I don't manage to read _all_ the
- traffic passing through this newsgroup), but a friend of mine sent me
- this quotation (without permission) from SunExpert magazine :
-
- | Attention all you university types, government researchers, kernel hackers
- | and wannabees: BSD 4.4 for SPARC has arrived. The latest version of the OS,
- | developed almost single-handedly by Chris Torek at LBL is in alpha test.
- | "We haven't got a SS2 port working yet." Says tTorek. The OS was ported to a
- | SS1.
- | Included in the release are the gcc compiler, kernel debugging tools, a
- | "usable" console, stable and accurate clocks and, according to Torek, "some
- | pretty fast TCP/IP code".
- |
- | In January 1991, LBL received six months of DARPA funding to do the port. By
- | October, Torek had a rudimentary system up and running. While he received
- | help from members of the SPRITE development project at Berkeley, Torek says
- | that LBL got no help from Sun whatsoever. He attributes this lack to a lack
- | of understanding on Sun's part. "Sun thought we wanted to compete with SunOS",
- | Torek says. He sees the two systems a fulfilling different needs.
- |
- | What's new in 4.4? "Almost everything," Torek says. The sustem is ANSI-C
- | compatible, and POSIX 1003.1 and 1003.2 compliant. It includes a new filesystem
- | layout, full NFS support, a complete OSI protocol stack, a new networking
- | architecture (which unifies sockets and Ritchie's "bstreams" [sic] I/O system),
- | a new virtual memory system (derived from Mach 2.5) and a redo of the OS'
- | process data structures.
- |
- | There's no date yet on when beta and production releases of 4.4. for SPARC will
- | be available. But Torek says he has more than enough alpha volunteers
- | already.
-
- Does anyone know anything more about this ?
-
- rog.
-