home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.theory
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!Germany.EU.net!olymp!uran!hermann
- From: hermann@uran.informatik.uni-bonn.de (Hermann Stamm)
- Subject: Re: "idiot"
- Message-ID: <1992Nov23.091235.19849@olymp.informatik.uni-bonn.de>
- Sender: usenet@olymp.informatik.uni-bonn.de
- Reply-To: hermann@uran.informatik.uni-bonn.de (Hermann Stamm)
- Organization: Praktische Informatik III
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 09:12:35 GMT
- Lines: 30
-
- Hello!
-
- In article <Nov.16.03.59.05.1992.2368@remus.rutgers.edu> Chris Long writes:
- |> In article <1992Nov15.110945.19939@ringer.cs.utsa.edu>, Daniel Jimenez writes:
- |>
- |> >> This proves that P=NP and all NP-complete and all other NP problems thus
- |> >> have polynomial time algorithms.
- |>
- |> Anyone who believes P=NP is an idiot.
- |>
- |> Case closed.
- |> --
- |> Chris Long, 265 Old York Rd., Bridgewater, NJ 08807-2618
-
-
- In my opinion it is ok for Chris to think so ("is an idiot"), but I think
- if he posts such comments here in comp.theory he should also be forced
- to tell the flaw(s) in the papers of E. Swart, which must exist if P!=NP !
- They are available via anonymous ftp from snowhite.cis.uoguelph.ca
- (131.104.48.1) under pub/comptheory/* . They are only 14/8/5 pages long,
- thus it can't be difficult for him if really P!=NP !
-
-
- Bye,
-
- Hermann.
-
-
- P.S.: I also think, that P!=NP, but I can't find any flaw in the papers til now.
-
-