home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!cc.usu.edu!sl05r
- From: sl05r@cc.usu.edu
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc
- Subject: Re: NeXT Trinitron Monitor
- Message-ID: <1992Nov19.103312.61042@cc.usu.edu>
- Date: 19 Nov 92 10:33:11 MDT
- References: <1992Nov17.162139.13607@cs.mcgill.ca> <1992Nov18.024710.4251@leland.Stanford.EDU>
- Organization: Utah State University
- Lines: 42
-
- In article <1992Nov18.024710.4251@leland.Stanford.EDU>, gcolello@biosphere.Stanford.EDU (Greg Colello) writes:
- > In article <1992Nov17.162139.13607@cs.mcgill.ca> samurai@cs.mcgill.ca
- > (Darcy BROCKBANK) writes:
- >>
- >> Well, it just arrived. All I can say after a year of using
- >> the Fimi monitor is:
- >>
- >> WOW, BLUE!!!!!
- >>
- >>
- >> The new monitor is VERY impressive. It is crisp, and clear,
- >> and the colors are WAY WAY WAY better than the old crappy
- >> monitor.
- >>
- >>
- >>
- >> THUMBS UP to NeXT on this one!
- >>
- >> - db
- >
- > Is that a Sony Trinitron? I assume 17".
- >
- > We have one of the 21" Color monitors, which we bought for $1000 more
- > because Next's own folks secretly said the 17" one was BAD. Well I wonder
- > how the new Trinitrons compare with the 21" monitor?
- >
- > -----------------------------------------------------------------
- > Greg Colello
- > Carnegie Institution, Department of Plant Biology
- > Stanford University
- > gcolello@biosphere.stanford.edu
-
- I have played around on both, and I think that while the 21" is better than the
- old 17", the new Trinitron 17" is VERY nice, better even than the 21" for
- display quality. The color saturation is great, and the display is rock solid
- and very nice on the eyes.
-
- Now how about a 21" Trinitron?...
-
- John Zollinger
- sl05r@cc.usu.edu
- (no NeXT mail please.)
-