home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!ferkel.ucsb.edu!taco!rock!stanford.edu!ames!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!ira.uka.de!smurf.sub.org!nadia!delos!ananke!ak
- From: ak@ananke.stgt.sub.org (Andreas Kaiser)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
- Subject: [IBM] XGA-2 Specs.
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <721840597snx@ananke.stgt.sub.org>
- References: <1992Nov12.231856.19708@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Sun, 15 Nov 92 15:16:37 GMT
- Organization: ananke
- Lines: 17
-
-
- In article <1992Nov12.231856.19708@watson.ibm.com> kaul@bcrvm1.vnet.ibm.com writes:
-
- > The XGA doesn't do well on the WINMARK benchmark (pulling only about a
- > 10), but that's because of the weighting of that benchmark. On
- > practical applications and programs it's much faster.
-
- I haven't seen XGA-2 so far, but XGA-1 is awefully slow when scrolling
- OS/2 Vio windows (PS/2-90 50Mhz). In this respect, it is considerably
- slower than an ISA ET4000 board used in 1024x768 16 color mode on a
- 33MHz 486 (OS/2 GA).
-
- Gruss, Andreas Kaiser
-
- :::::::::::::::::::: subnet: ak@ananke.stgt.sub.org
- :: Andreas Kaiser :: fidonet: 2:241/7220.9
- ::::::::::::::::::::
-