home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!sun4nl!spider.research.ptt.nl!freyr!annius
- From: annius@eri.research.ptt.nl (Annius Groenink)
- Subject: Re: NOTE: 16-bit Falcon bus may not be so bad.
- Message-ID: <annius.722285596@freyr>
- Sender: usenet@spider.research.ptt.nl (USEnet News)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: eri.research.ptt.nl
- Reply-To: A.V.Groenink@research.ptt.nl
- Organization: PTT Research
- References: <11121@uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au>
- Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 18:53:16 GMT
- Lines: 14
-
- warwick@cs.uq.oz.au (Warwick Allison) writes:
-
- >Remember that the Quickindex figures showed the Falcon to be approx 50%
- >of the speed of the TT for CPU-memory related tests (not 25%) - indicating
- >that the Falcon does not suffer a 50% loss in speed from the 16-bit bus,
- >or the TT is 16bit... or 16MHz :-).
-
- Well that would be a test concerning ST RAM, which after all could very well
- be on a 16 bit data bus, and the TT would still be 32 bit (provided you get
- yourself some neat TT RAM).
-
- --
- Annius Groenink -- Universiteit Utrecht -- PTT Research Leidschendam
- annius@research.ptt.nl/avgroeni@cs.ruu.nl Maths/Comp.Sc./TOS/Music
-