home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!nobody
- From: denson@sdd.hp.com (Craig Denson)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: Subtasks, IEEE library pointers - y.a.Q
- Date: 19 Nov 1992 13:09:31 -0800
- Organization: it must be somewhere, i put it right here...
- Lines: 14
- Message-ID: <1egvqcINNfos@hpsdln.sdd.hp.com>
- References: <jbickers.0iey@templar.actrix.gen.nz> <1992Nov19.150345.19491@samba.oit.unc.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: hpsdln.sdd.hp.com
- Keywords: Libraries
-
- In article <1992Nov19.150345.19491@samba.oit.unc.edu> Todd_Lewis@unc.edu (Todd M. Lewis) writes:
-
- >... I've got different library
- >bases and there is no reasonable way to write subtasks that handle
- >that..
-
- this is where i lose the thread. what is in these libraries that
- must be the same. if it's a copy of the same code at a different
- location why should you care? are the bits a different color? :-)
- what's in the libraries that isn't relocatable? or are you using
- library data as part of your application's data structure? - that
- doesn't sound too good.
-
- craig
-