home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.sys.amiga.misc:17249 comp.sys.amiga.advocacy:29666
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
- Path: sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!emory!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!torn!spartan.ac.BrockU.CA!tmc
- From: tmc@spartan.ac.BrockU.CA (Tim Ciceran)
- Subject: Re: DSP not as good as we thought?
- Message-ID: <1992Nov21.204420.905@spartan.ac.BrockU.CA>
- Organization: Brock University, St. Catharines Ontario
- Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 20:44:20 GMT
- Lines: 14
-
- In article <1992Nov21.095609.11474@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au> ins739l@lindblat.cc.monash.edu.au (William Fang) writes:
- >Anybody out there has a true idea of what can be done with a DSP chip?
- >Some questions I would like answered would be:
- >
- >o Who makes them
- >o Various prices and specs, is xxx better than yyy?
- >o What can be done with a DSP
- >o How this is done (not just.. can emulate modem, make sound, etc..)
- >o Why it is better than using the main processor
-
- I'd suggest checking out the October edition of Byte. You'll find an excellent
- overview of the design philosophy, architecture and applications for DSP
- technology.
-
-