home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!news.univie.ac.at!hp4at!mcsun!sunic!seunet!augs!Kenneth_Ekman
- From: Kenneth_Ekman@augs.se (Kenneth Ekman)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
- Subject: Re: A4000 -=> 68EC040
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <Kenneth_Ekman.0gw9@augs.se>
- Date: 22 Nov 92 23:27:50 CET
- Organization: Amiga User Group - Sweden
- Lines: 34
-
- In article <1eiub4INN9qn@mercury.kingston.ac.uk> cs_e445@ceres (Vlod
- Kalicun) writes:
- >Well Amiga Format (UK Magazine) reviewed the 4000 and they said it was a
- >68EC040. (without FPU or MMU).
- >
- >Has anyone from C= actually said that its a true 040??
- >I don't want to write into the mag, to set them straight if I haven't got
- >my facts right. Unfortunately I'm a student and can't afford a 4000 YET,
- so
- >can't see it.
-
- There is no doubt that the A4000 has the full blown 68040. I have a C=
- press
- release that states that the processor has integrated FPU and MMU units.
-
- On the article mentioned, I recently browsed a UK magazine, that had
- reviewed the 4000, in which hardly one feature was correct!
- For example they stated that the chipset didn't have a HAM mode anymore and
- that the excellent MultiView could not open it's own screen, both of which
- are untrue.
-
- It might be the same review as the one you're referring to, I don't know,
- but if it was, the error you mentioned wasn't the only one...
-
- >Any chance of introducing an educational discount C= ????
- >
- >Vlod
-
- That's *exactly* what I'm hoping for :-)
-
- ___/ Ken... (EE student at the University of Linkoping, Sweden) it was a
-
- -- Via DLG Pro v0.995
-
-