home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!cs.uoregon.edu!ogicse!news.u.washington.edu!ns1.nodak.edu!plains.NoDak.edu!person
- From: person@plains.NoDak.edu (Brett G Person )
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
- Subject: Re: OS/2 memory management (ARGH!)
- Message-ID: <BxuAFo.Fqt@ns1.nodak.edu>
- Date: 17 Nov 92 02:47:48 GMT
- Article-I.D.: ns1.BxuAFo.Fqt
- References: <1b68f11e@p11.f9.n242.z2.fidonet.org> <721559538marten.marten@feki.toppoint.de>
- Sender: usenet@ns1.nodak.edu (News login)
- Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network
- Lines: 18
- Nntp-Posting-Host: plains.nodak.edu
-
- In article <721559538marten.marten@feki.toppoint.de> marten@feki.toppoint.de (Marten Feldtmann) writes:
- >In article <1b68f11e@p11.f9.n242.z2.fidonet.org> Roman_Grzondziel@freax.fido.de (Roman Grzondziel) writes:
- >
-
- > A question: why are there always 512 KB available ?
- >
- My guess is that 512K is theminimum amount of memory that OS/2 will need to
- do things like a load, save, or swap. I started using OS/2 with the minimum
- memory required ( $M) and quickly added another two. From hat I can tell,
- OS/2 is still reserving 512K.
-
- I'm planning on adding more memory when memory prices sablize.
-
- --
- Brett Person
- Guest Account
- North Dakota State University
- person@plains.nodak.edu || person@plains.bitnet
-