home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!news.oc.com!spssig.spss.com!uchinews!ellis!sip1
- From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
- Subject: Re: copyini vs cpyini
- Message-ID: <1992Nov22.213113.1978@midway.uchicago.edu>
- Keywords: OS2SYS.INI file size growing
- Sender: news@uchinews.uchicago.edu (News System)
- Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
- Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
- References: <1992Nov21.182355.725@wam.umd.edu> <10027@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP> <10028@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP>
- Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 21:31:13 GMT
- Lines: 20
-
- In article <10028@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP> djbpitt+@pitt.edu (David J Birnbaum) writes:
- >>The cpyini program that I an d (I suspect) most people are using is the
- >>one in the hobbes uploads directory, which does not have a companion program.
- >>In my opinion, it is much easier to use than the checkini/copyini programs
- >>which have been around for quite some time now.
- >I just checked this out. Except for the name change (copyini.exe vs
- >cpyini.exe), these files seem identical (date, time, size, and look and
- >feel). How can one be easier than the other? One less letter to type in
- >the filename? :-)
-
- While we're on the subject of the massively growing INI file, and
- after apparently ruling out DeskPic as the culprit, is there anyone
- NOT using 4OS2 who suffers from the problem? (In other words, shall
- 4OS2 be nominated as the culprit?)
-
- --
- Timothy F. Sipples | Read the OS/2 FAQ List 2.0g, available from
- sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/info
- Dept. of Econ., Univ. | /faq, or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP")
- of Chicago, 60637 | [Read the List, THEN post to ONE OS/2 newsgroup.]
-