home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: kevinl@tisdec.tis.tandy.com
- Date: 19 Nov 92 08:35 CST
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
- Subject: Re: Borland C++ for OS/2
- Message-ID: <13000005@tisdec.tis.tandy.com>
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!wupost!ukma!cs.widener.edu!eff!news.oc.com!utacfd.uta.edu!trsvax!trsvax!tisdec.tis.tandy.com!kevinl
- Nf-ID: #N:tisdec.tis.tandy.com:13000005:000:793
- Nf-From: tisdec.tis.tandy.com!kevinl Nov 19 08:35:00 1992
- Lines: 15
-
-
- The Borland C++ 3.1 w/App FW does indeed take up about 50Meg. "What makes
- it worth that" is the full source for the libraries, extensive Object Oriented
- DOS and Windows Class libraries, the command line compiler, the DOS
- IDE/Compiler, the Windows IDE/Compiler, the DOS Debugger, the Windows Debugger,
- the Assempler (which has object oriented features--don't ask!), loads of
- examples, lots and lots of utilities, and much more that I can't think of.
- It's an excellent product, and Borland C++ for OS/2 is all I'm waiting for
- to make my move to OS/2 complete. Borland C++ 3.1 is the only thing that keeps
- a DOS partition on my machine, and if I can't have Borland for OS/2, I won't
- stay with OS/2. (Biased, but I'm a professional programmer--and nothing else
- even comes close!)
-
- Cheers :')
-
-