home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!kuhub.cc.ukans.edu!spssig.spss.com!uchinews!ellis!sip1
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
- Subject: Re: Windows don't remember positions
- Message-ID: <1992Nov15.193424.12301@midway.uchicago.edu>
- From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
- Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1992 19:34:24 GMT
- Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
- Sender: news@uchinews.uchicago.edu (News System)
- Followup-To: comp.os.os2.advocacy
- References: <1992Nov9.193724.8543@wam.umd.edu> <1992Nov10.040059.24608@midway.uchicago.edu> <15NOV199211175563@venus.tamu.edu>
- Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
- Lines: 84
-
- In article <15NOV199211175563@venus.tamu.edu> ebb7683@venus.tamu.edu (BLACKMAN, EDWARD B) writes:
- >>Actually, they did provide several methods to prune the INI files. In
- >>the Redbooks, for example, they suggest making back ups of these INI
- >>files, so that you can revert to the old one should you do something
- >>you don't like. They have issued rudimentary INI file editors as part
- >>of the Employee Written Software program (look on
- >>software.watson.ibm.com), and there are various third party efforts
- >>(e.g. ShowINI, INIMaint, etc).
- >What about the people who don't know about/have access to outside sources
- >like bulletin boards and FTP sites?
-
- I hardly think it likely that people don't know about at least one
- BBS. In every OS/2 package (at least in the U.S.) the telephone
- number for the IBM National Support Center BBS is listed. Every copy
- of OS/2 includes PM Terminal, so the software isn't an issue either.
- One might argue that lack of a modem is possible, I suppose, but in
- this day of $39 2400 bps modems, it at least isn't a major expense on
- a $2000 computer system.
-
- But see below.
-
- >> The ALT-F1 trick on boot up restores
- >>the INI files and desktop from the install defaults. And the MAKEINI
- >>program, documented in the printed material accompanying OS/2, does
- >>something similar.
- >I'm sorry, Tim, but to suggest using Alt-F1 or MAKEINI to prune bloated INI
- >files is like saying "You want to trim your hair, eh? Well, you've got a
- >perfectly good weed trimmer. Why don't you try that?" It does the job, but
- >the damage it does is greater than the good.
-
- True. I am not suggesting those are acceptable methods for everyone.
- I am suggesting that they are possible alternatives, in a fairly long
- list of possible alternatives.
-
- Let's step back a minute. OS/2 is designed to be a general purpose
- operating system to fit within certain constraints (e.g. DOS/Windows
- compatibility, operation on 386 PCs, about 30 MB in size, etc). I
- have my quarrels with some of the design decisions. (IBM didn't ask
- me, but if they did I'd have more than enough comments on how to
- improve the product.) However, I can't really fault them for not
- providing every conceivable feature, utility, etc. Somewhere they had
- to make compromises -- it is inevitable. They decided that if you
- needed an INI file editor you should dial up a BBS and get one (or
- call a shareware diskette service, or enlist the services of a
- friendly IBM SE, or order it on CD-ROM as part of the PDK) -- it
- wasn't included in the base package. The base package manuals explain
- how to backup said INI files and how to restore them from a selection
- of provided defaults, but to edit, well, you have to look elsewhere.
-
- That was the decision. I'm not sure I have an opinion on it one way
- or the other, but I do want you to understand that there was a reason
- for the decision, essentially that they did not feel the extra hundred
- kilobytes was a penalty everyone should have to pay (either in terms
- of the number of diskettes to shuffle or actual hard disk space).
-
- Now, supposedly I'm a power user :-), but I must tell you that I
- haven't edited my INI files all that much. When I did, it was
- essentially to test the INI file editors that had been released. I'm
- probably not alone.
-
- I am certainly not arguing that an INI file editor would have been a
- good thing to have, other things being equal. But that's the point,
- really, "other things being equal."
-
- [Incidentally, the same applies to Visual REXX, extra typefaces, the
- Service Pak, networking features, MMPM/2, EPM updates/toolkit, free
- C/C++ compilers, newsreaders, mailers, and so forth. There's an awful
- lot of good material out there that didn't make it into the base
- package. My pet peeve, actually, is that IBM did not include a
- "decent" disk backup package. I understand BACKUP is enough for some,
- but, if I had my way, I would have put in an adequate disk/tape backup
- package and left out, say, Reversi. I also realize most users prefer
- to play Reversi and would give up the backup package -- most users
- don't make backups, sadly.
-
- While I'm at it, I also would have left out BASIC and BASICA (and
- stuck with QBASIC), but some people go ballistic without BASIC and
- BASICA.]
-
- --
- Timothy F. Sipples | Read the OS/2 FAQ List 2.0g, available from
- sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/info
- Dept. of Econ., Univ. | /faq, or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP")
- of Chicago, 60637 | [Read the List, THEN post to ONE OS/2 newsgroup.]
-