home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!udel!louie!tweety.cis.udel.edu!duzan
- From: duzan@tweety.cis.udel.edu (Gary D. Duzan)
- Subject: Re: capability references?
- Message-ID: <1992Nov19.122554.24202@udel.edu>
- Sender: usenet@udel.edu (USENET News Service)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: tweety.cis.udel.edu
- Organization: Your Organization Could Be Here!
- References: <BxxB6K.4wo@beach.csulb.edu>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 12:25:54 GMT
- Lines: 28
-
- In article <BxxB6K.4wo@beach.csulb.edu> werts@grover.cecs.csulb.edu (Michael Werts) writes:
- =>I am working on a survey of recent research for my operating
- =>systems course. My preferred topic is capabilities in operating
- =>systems. However I have had difficulty finding any references
- =>within the last five years, other than to Amoeba. I do have a
- =>pretty good set of reference prior to that, including the Levy
- =>book which has a bibliography.
- =>
- Capabilities seem to have gone out of fashion, for the most part. I
- understand that OS/400 for the IBM AS/400 system is a capability based
- object system, but I haven't gotten that deep into it myself.
-
- =>{ By the way, is comp.os.research moderated? I have been totally
- =>unable to post there. }
- =>
- Yes, it is.
-
- Gary D. Duzan
- Network Administrator
- Delaware State Hospital
-
-
-
- --
- duzan@cis.udel.edu
- _o_ ------------------ _o_
- [|o o|] Virtual Reality? No thanks, I've already got one. [|o o|]
- |_O_| Disclaimer: I have no idea what I am talking about. |_O_|
-