home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!news.univie.ac.at!hp4at!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!dcs.ed.ac.uk!pdc
- From: pdc@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Paul Crowley)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
- Subject: Re: Packaging Linux
- Message-ID: <By2p72.Fnq@dcs.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 21 Nov 92 15:47:26 GMT
- References: <17612@mindlink.bc.ca> <1992Nov20.160444.16116@scifi.uucp> <1992Nov20.160323.18982@ms.uky.edu> <1992Nov20.233536.28788@colorado.edu>
- Sender: cnews@dcs.ed.ac.uk (UseNet News Admin)
- Reply-To: pdc@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Paul Crowley)
- Organization: Do they make a washing powder called Caliban Automatic?
- Lines: 26
-
- Quoting drew@kinglear.cs.colorado.edu (Drew Eckhardt) in article <1992Nov20.233536.28788@colorado.edu>:
- >
- >Joe User won't port code, contribute fixes or source, and will annoy
- >real Linux users with his whining about there not being a "real" editor,
- >about Linux being difficult because it isn't dos, etc.
- >
- >So do we care if Joe User uses Linux?
-
- Yes! Yes, we certainly do care. The fact is that many people have to
- use commercial software for some of the stuff they do. If Joe User
- starts using Linux, software houses might start porting their software
- to Linux so Joe buys it. At about this point, people might start to
- think ``Why spend money enslaving myself to Microsoft when I can have
- freedom to move platforms and a real operating system for nothing?''
-
- As I see it, we want people to write for X and port to Windows and not
- the other way around. I think free software is very nice, but not
- *important*; what's important is free *standards*. Any commercial
- standard that only one vendor implements is very bad news; such a
- standard must be fought.
-
- That's why Linux is so important; it gives us leverage in establishing a
- competing free standard.
- _____ __
- \\ // Paul Crowley pdc@dcs.ed.ac.uk /o \/
- \X/ "I'm the boy without a sole" \__/\
-