home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!ukma!darwin.sura.net!sgiblab!bridge2!news.claremont.edu!fenris!jwinstea
- From: jwinstea@fenris.claremont.edu (Jim Winstead Jr.)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
- Subject: Re: a shell idea
- Message-ID: <1992Nov16.183020.2264@muddcs.claremont.edu>
- Date: 16 Nov 92 18:30:20 GMT
- References: <1e8m7pINN51i@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>
- Sender: news@muddcs.claremont.edu (The News System)
- Organization: Harvey Mudd College, WIBSTR
- Lines: 18
-
- In article <1e8m7pINN51i@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> mal11@po.CWRU.Edu (Matthew A. Lewis) writes:
- >i was thinking that one could create a "super" shell which understood
- >the syntax of all the major shells: csh, tcsh, ksh, sh, bash, ash, etc.
- >of course, size would be affected, but imagine the power, not to
- >mention the end of all the bickering.
-
- Um, why? I would much rather have five binaries for tcsh, ksh, bash,
- rc, and some other shell on my system that I could trim down if I
- needed (like delete tcsh since I wouldn't use it...) rather than some
- monolithic beast that contained features I really don't need.
-
- Small is beautiful.
-
- --
- loveritablessencentipedependentalism+ Jim Winstead Jr. (CSci '95)
- andaterrificklengtherealityearguessy| Harvey Mudd College, WIBSTR
- mpathybridgenerationiceremonymphysic| jwinstea@jarthur.Claremont.EDU
- alendareadvertisexpresshothoughthend+ or jwinstea@fenris.Claremont.EDU
-