home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!dsinc!dsinc!not-for-mail
- From: syd@dsi.com (Syd Weinstein)
- Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
- Subject: Re: Reply to Sender?
- Date: 23 Nov 1992 14:15:17 -0500
- Organization: Datacomp Systems, Inc., Huntingdon Valley, PA
- Lines: 20
- Message-ID: <1erak5INNsmd@dsinc.dsi.com>
- References: <1992Nov23.180326.5757@mp.cs.niu.edu>
- Reply-To: syd@DSI.COM
- NNTP-Posting-Host: dsinc.dsi.com
-
- higgins@mp.cs.niu.edu (Greg Higgins) writes:
- >I manage a mailing list and have observed that certain folks
- >have a tendency to reply to the Sender address rather than
- >the From address. From what I have been able to descern,
- >most, if not all of these folks are using some version of
- >ELM.
-
- >Does this make sense to anyone, or should I be looking
- >for something else - say a common MTA instead of MUA?
- Elm does not read nor understand the 'Sender: ' header.
-
- However, depending on how Elm is configure it will use
- either the 'From ' header or the last one found of
- 'From:' or 'Reply-To:'. If not 'From:' or 'Reply-To:'
- is found, 'From ' is used.
- --
- ========================================================================
- Sydney S. Weinstein, CDP, CCP Elm Coordinator - Current 2.4PL11
- Datacomp Systems, Inc. Projected 3.0 Release: ??? ?,1994
- syd@DSI.COM or dsinc!syd Voice: (215) 947-9900, FAX: (215) 938-0235
-